Unpaid Entertainer.com

 

 

Sports Commentary

As a long time sports fan, I have grown complacent with the happenings year in and year out in the world of sports.

The reason for this is the fact that in general, nothing out of the ordinary happens from year to year.

Sure, a different team wins the championship every season for the most part and the franchises at the top generally fade away over the course of a few years making room for the latest talented teams to come along.

And sure, big name players change teams, often creating excitement and making a 2nd tier team a potential contender.

But these things are just part of the cycle. And for the most part, the cycle simply repeats itself again and again every few seasons.

As a result of this, I have compiled a list of things in sports that I would like to see occur. I like to see things that have never happened before. That is what truly gets me excited as a sports fan.

Also, unlike many other sports fans, I tend not to root for the underdog just for sake of rooting for the underdog. I like to see excellence prevail, so when I am emotionally neutral about the teams or individuals competing, I tend to support the athletically superior team.

This is not the case however when I harbor a rational or irrational dislike for one of the individuals or teams in question, nor is it the case when a local team is playing. The exception to this is when Michigan State is involved. I root for them to lose at all costs, unless an MSU victory somehow benefits the Michigan Wolverines. I could write a whole essay on how much I hate Michigan State and how much shallow satisfaction I get from seeing them fail, and I may someday, but not this day.

9-24-08

If you live in the state of Michigan or are connected to the sports world in any way, you've undoubtedly heard the news Lions fans have been calling for for half a decade:

Matt Millen is no longer the President of the Detroit Lions.

I found out while casually checking out the local newpaper's website on my lunch-break, about an hour after the story initially broke. I perused over to freep.com, the website of the Detroit Free Press to read some of the columnists initial thoughts. After reading their articles, I felt as I've felt through the past nine years or so since Barry Sanders retired.

I felt apathetic.

Which I guess makes me a fair-weather fan. But not totally. Because I still watch them almost every weekend. The only difference is that I watch them knowing that they're going to lose. The outcome is more obvious than a WWE match. Predicting a Lions loss is like predicting that Lindsay Lohan will do drugs, smash her SUV and act promiscuously this weekend. Some things in life ARE guaranteed.

I've read a lot of fluff pieces in the past 12 hours about the Millen firing. But quite frankly, what's really changed? The Lions still have the same shitty team, the same mediocre quarterback, the same unmotivated coaching staff - they're still the fucking Lions.

What's changed? Nothing. And nothing will. They'll clean house. They'll hire a big name to fill the position. That big name (ahem Marty Schottenheimer, you heard it here first) will assume the GM duties and dump the Marinelli experiment, only to perpetuate the tradition of 'M' names (albeit only his first name) by appointing himself head coach for next season.

All of that said, I actually feel for Millen a little. For all of the criticism, for all of the horrific things that have been said about him for the past several seasons, he never wavered. He never caved to the pressure or the opinions of people who think they have all the answers but in reality their accountability doesn't go past the words they speak into a microphone, or snarky remarks that find their way to print or to the sports section of a web page.

The fact is, Matt Millen tried. I believe he did his best. Did he suck at his job? Yes. I think his inexperience in such an exceptionally complicated and high profile position was simple more than the man could handle. Does this make him a bad person? I certainly don't believe so. Do you truly believe his intention was to make the Detroit Lions the worst team in the league year in and year out? A man that won four Super Bowls wants to be a loser?

Your pissed because he did a shitty job. Fine. But lets see things for what they really are, shall we?

He opened his tenure with no coaching staff and the third pick in the draft, needing help in every facet of football not called special teams. He had the opportunity to draft a high-profile college quarterback. The fact that it didn't work out isn't Millen's fault.

Charles Rogers. Millen probably didn't do his homework here. He saw a local boy with a 4.3 in the 40 yeard dash and nothing else mattered. A broken collarbone each of Rogers' first two seasons didn't help either.

Roy Williams. He was supposed to be the dual threat along side Rogers right? Except the other receiver couldn't stay healthy (or off drugs) and there wasn't a quarterback to throw to him (or either of them). As misguided as the draft choice was, it's a good thing he did choose Williams. He's the only one of the first three receivers chosen that's still with the team.

Mike Williams. Completely inexcusable fucking blunder of a draft choice. Sometimes you have to call a spade a spade.

Stockar McDougal. He was supposd to be a bad-ass tackle. Injuries kept that from working out, but what are you going to do? Some things you can't predict.

The fact is, Matt Millen simply didn't get the job done. This wasn't for lack of effort or lack or desire. He simply didn't have the experience or the ability that the position required. For this, he should be released, but not with the indignity that has been thrust upon him in the past 12 hours - not to mention the past five years.

 

9-7-08

The Lions season starts in about an hour. I have them going 5-11 this year.

The Lions are perpetual losers in certain situations. On paper, this team should be able to contend for the NFC North title - or at least a wildcard spot. But they won't. Here's why:

The Lions do not play well on the west coast. Nor do they play particularly well in 4:00 pm games in general. Week three in San Francisco and week seven in Houston are games the Lions could and probably should win, but they won't.

The Lions do not win in Green Bay or in Minnesota. Period. There's two more losses.

Week 16 New Orleans at Detroit. The Lions will play hard and tough, but NO will likely be playing for a playoff spot and will come in hungry. The Lions will lose a close one here.

Week 10 Jacksonville at Detroit. Jacksonville is going to be one of the best teams in the league. I don't see the Lions in an upset here.

Week 15 at Indianapolis. With Indy in the playoff hunt and the Lions playing for pride(?), combined with the fact that this game is on the road, Indy is a pretty solid pick.

Week 8 Washington at Detroit. The Redskins just seem to have Detroit's number. On paper, the Lions will likely be favorites in this one, but I still like Washington by a touchdown.

Week 11 at Carolina. The Panthers will be one of the best teams in the league, and will destroy the Lions in a blowout.

Week 9 at Chicago. This one is more of a toss-up. I go with Chicago since Detroit will likely have won against then in week five at home. This will motivate them to play well and their defense will dominate the game.

Week 13 Tennessee at Detroit. The Lions always seem to have one or two home games in the middle of the season that they should win but always find a way not to. That's pretty much the only basis I have for picking the Titans in this one.

---

For their wins, I have them winning week one 34-30 in Atlanta, at home against Green Bay in week two, at home against Chicago in week five (making them 3-1 at this point), week 12 at home against Tampa and week 14 at home against Minnesota.

8-8-08

Here's an entertaining article from FindSportsNow about the three-week-long abomination that's about to ensue.

 

 

8-6-08

As of this writing it seems to be a certainty that Brett Favre will not end his career as a Green Bay Packer.

In all of my time as a sports fan/observer, I cannot think of a more unnatural and perverse set of circumstances than seeing Favre's name and number four on a jersey other than that of the dark green & gold. This includes seeing Michael Jordan in a minor league baseball uniform, Dennis Rodman doing, well everything Dennis Rodman does, and Jason Giambi's moustache.

It's really more sad than anything. Maybe it's because Pro Football has an element to it's league that transcends the other major sports. In baseball, basketball and hockey, players, even star/marquee players change teams on a fairly regular basis. It is truly unusual for a player, regardless of talent, to spend his whole career with the same team. In the age of salary caps, trade deadlines and fire sales, basically everyone is expendable. That's where football is different. John Elway, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Michael Strahan, Barry Sanders, etc.: there are numerous examples of great players who've spent their entire careers with the same franchise. Furthermore, even the great players who hang on a little too long (see: Emmitt Smith; Jerry Rice) and try to pick up with another team usually have spent their productive seasons all in the same place.

Favre chose to retire. He committed to not being part of the team any longer. He trained his successor to the point of competence and then hung up his cleats. He left the game holding practically every single passing record, he left as a Super Bowl champion, a lock to be a first ballot hall of famer. He left a legend; The Gunslinger they called him. An absolutely infallible deity amongst both Cheeseheads and football fans alike. How many are able to do that?

But now he has the itch to play again. This is like seeing the woman that you broke up with a month ago with a younger, better looking man and all of a sudden you want her back. It doesn't work that way. Brett Favre should stay retired and ride off into his merry Mississippi sunset with what's left of his image and integrity intact.

At this point, seeing Farve in any jersey other than a Packer's one would be a travesty and a disgrace against his legacy.

 

5-20-08

The Piston & the Celtics are playing in the Eastern Conference finals.

The Celtics will win Game One, the Pistons will win Game Two in Boston.

The Pistons will win Game Three and Boston will win Game Four and Game Five back in Boston. Detroit will win Games Six and Seven.

---

The Red Wings open the Stanley Cup Finals against Pittsburgh Saturday. I predict they will win the cup in four games. Henrik Zetterberg wins the Conn Smythe Trophy.

11-11-07

The Lions will lose tonight at Arizona.

Update 8-21-07

I am particularly sick of a common strategic practice in pro baseball. The overuse of the intentional walk has diminished the integrity of the game during it's crucial moments.

Issuing an intentional walk to an opposing team's best player as a strategic means during the critical stages of the game is like allowing the San Diego Chargers to have 12 men on the field but not allowing LaDainian Tomlinson to touch the ball, or like allowing the Chicago Bulls to shoot into a basket that is 20% larger than the standard size but not allowing Michael Jordan to shoot or the ball. The point is, with intentional walks, the benefit to the team receiving the walk does not outweigh the disadvantage suffered by the defensive team.

I'd like to see a new rule implemented in Major League Baseball, one that much severely penalizes the defensive team for walking a batter without throwing a strike, whether intentionally or not.

Here's a couple ideas:

If a batter walks on four pitches, the batter is allowed to advance two bases instead of one. This eliminates the intentional walk as a means of setting up a potential double play.

Another idea is to give the batter (or manager) the option of taking first base or forcing the pitcher to throw another pitch, with all baserunners advancing one base for every additional ball thrown. If this option is chosen, the batter foregoes any future options to walk, and must bat until the ball is put in play or he strikes out.

6-25-07

The Lions will finish this season 6-10. Here's why:

The Lions sucked on defense last year. Losing Dre Bly will not improve this. If their key players stay healthy (which they probably will not), you can probably upgrade their defensive status to slightly below average, which will allow them to win a shootout or two.

The Lions offensive line is bad, which causes them to not be able to run the ball. When Kevin Jones is healthy, and the Lions are playing a shitty team, they are able to run the ball fairly well. But they play Minnesota and Chicago twice, both of whom had stellar run defenses last year.

The Lions offense as a whole could be exciting. With Roy Williams emerging and Calvin Johnson's potential to light up the scoreboard, the Lions run game should improve by proxy. The problem is, the Lions will only win the games where they can outscore their opponent. The Lions continue to put themselves in positions where they can't win a game without scoring 30 points. There aren't enough defensively inept teams in the league to make this a viable strategy.

And lastly, you can always count on the Lions to lose a couple game that they should have won. On paper, this offense alone should make them a wildcard contender. But, by the end of October, Lions fans will be chantin' for Stanton after they're off to yet another sub-standard start.

I see the Lions beating Minnesota at home, Green Bay at home, Dallas at home, Arizona on the road, Tampa Bay at home, and Oakland on the road for their six wins.

The Lions will actually have the best chance in years of actually making the playoffs, likely being 6-7 going into the final three games of the season. But, they have to play San Diego on the road, Kansas City at home, then Green Bay at Lambeau Field on Dec. 30th to finish the season. They are going to lose all three of those games, causing Lions fans to become temporarily over-excited and unnecessarily disappointed yet again.But hey, look at the bright side, won't six wins be a personal best for Matt Millen?

6-2-07

The Pistons play the Cavs tonight in Cleveland for game 6 of the Eastern Conference Finals.

Prediction # 1: The Pistons will lose. They will lose by nine points. Final Score: 89-80. Cleveland has ALL the momentum, a huge factor for a young team with nothing to lose. Also, the game is in Cleveland, and Lebron James is on fire and eager to prove he can finish. (6-3-07 EDIT: Sometimes I hate being right)

Prediction # 2: The Spurs will beat Cleveland in six games to win the NBA Championship. (6-16-07 EDIT: This was a no-brainer and probably shouldn't count it was so easy.)

The reason is Cleveland does not have enough talent, experience, or veteran leadership to beat San Antonio. Lebron James was enough to get past sub-par opponents in the first two rounds of the playoffs, then beat the Pistons, who came into the series overconfident and over-rated.

James is a great player, and Ilgauskas is a solid, under-rated big-man. But other than that, Cleveland has little to rely on. Drew Gooden and Larry Hughes are pretenders.

Prediction # 3: The loss will cause the Pistons to immediately deal Rip Hamilton, Rasheed Wallace and the higher of their first round draft choices for Kobe Bryant and a scrub. This could occur before the NBA finals conclude.

Prediction # 4: Lebron James will not win an NBA Championship with Cleveland. Detroit will come back stronger than before in the next few years. Chicago is also a team sharply on the rise and Miami will bounce back and regain their championship form from last year, making the Eastern Conference more dominant than the West once again. Cleveland, like the Orlando Magic in 1995, will have reached their peak this season.

4-20-07

Some things I'd like to see in sports:

I'd like to see Tiger Woods win. A lot. I know he already has, and it will take a bona fide act of Allah to prevent him from breaking The Bear's record of 18 major tournament wins. I feel as though we are witnessing the career of the greatest golfer to ever live, and there's something special about that. I hope he sets the bar so high that it will take a truly gifted athlete a lifetime to challenge his mark. Furthermore, Tiger Woods personifies excellence and class on and off the golf course, for that reason I admire him and root for him to win.

I'd like to see a horse win the triple crown. It hasn't happened in my lifetime. A handful of times in the last decade or so a horse has won the first two legs, only to get upset in the Belmont Stakes by a longshot. It seems as though a monkey riding a zebra could win the Preakness and the Kentucky Derby, but the last contest, the longest of the three, is anyone's race.

I for one, do not like the parity that has been a staple of NFL competition for the past 12 years or so. The problem I have, is that there is no team to beat per se. In any given season, there's no guarantee that the superior teams from the prior season will be any better than average. The reasons for this have been discussed ad nauseum elsewhere, with free agency, salary cap issues, and injuries generally agreed to be the main culprits.

Any given Sunday, any one team is capable of beating another. It used to be that there were a couple of superior teams that by which the rest of the league was compared. In the 70's, it was Pittsburgh. In the 80's, it was San Francisco and the New York Giants. In the early 90's it was Dallas and to a lesser extent Buffalo. And in the mid to late 90's Green Bay was the toughest place to play, and opposing players loathed playing in Wisconsin at the end of the season and in the playoffs.

It would take major changes and will probably never occur, but I would like to see a team DOMINATE for years. Watching a team squeak into the last spot of the playoffs, go on a miracle run and win the Super Bowl, only to start the following season 2-6 and not even make the playoffs is boring. How often do we see a team play in the Super Bowl one year only to fall flat on their asses the following season? It happens way too often.

Need examples? Tampa won the SB a few years back, they haven't done shit since. They played Oakland in that SB, who have been even worse since. New England won the first of their SB championships, then missed the playoffs entirely the following year (although, they did win the SB the next two years, but they are the exception). The Giants played in the SB (after barely making it into the playoffs) against Baltimore and lost. In the following years, they sucked so bad NY fired their coach and hired Tom Coughlin, who alienated one of the best running backs in the league to the point that he retired during the prime of his career.

It has gotten to the point that the window of opportunity for an NFL team to accomplish anything significant has shrank to the size of a pinhole. If only the Lions could somehow take advantage of this system and manage to win more than five games in a season. It's been proven that you don't have to be good for very long, just long enough, and at the right time.

I'd like to see a hitter break DiMaggio's 56 game consecutive hit streak record. This record is so pristine that baseball people get excited when a player gets halfway there. Furthermore, this is one of the rare records in sports that when broken, no real argument to trivialize the accomplishment exists.

Look at the home-run craze of the past 10 years (and prior). In 1991, Cecil Fielder his 51 home runs in that season, the first time someone hit over 50 since 1977. I remember back then how big of a deal it was that someone hit 50, let alone anyone get close to the record at the time which was 61. Anymore, it's not uncommon for several players to hit more than 50 in the same season. And that untouchable record of 61 has been eclipsed several times in the past 9 years, with the record now at 73.

The home run record has been impurified and the accomplishments have been dimished by steroids, by new hitter-friendly ballparks, by expansion's impact on the quality of pitching etc.

But, the hit streak record is immune from such counter-arguments. It is a feat that would be achieved by skill and consistency alone.

I'd like to see someone hit .400 in a season. It hasn't happened in my lifetime.

I'd like to see someone win the triple crown in baseball. I think the last player to do it was George Brett in 1980.

 

 

 

 

© Unpaid Entertainer All Rights Reserved